Why Trump And The Trump Of The Middle East Are Fast Friends

Why Trump And The Trump Of The Middle East Are Fast Friends

Donald Trump hosted Iraq's new Prime Minister, Ali al-Zaidi, at the White House, and the mutual admiration was hard to miss. Trump immediately talked up their "tremendous chemistry." He praised the 41-year-old Iraqi leader as a "fantastic champion" who won his election soundly.

On paper, they share a distinct bond. Both are wealthy business magnates who climbed to the absolute top of their respective governments without a single day of prior political experience. Al-Zaidi, a billionaire former banker, has even been dubbed the "Trump of the Middle East."

But behind the broad smiles and backpatting in the Oval Office, a much more complicated, high-stakes geopolitical drama is unfolding. This meeting wasn't just a friendly chat between two political outsiders. It was a calculated move to reshape the balance of power in the Middle East, shift Iraq's economic dependence, and squeeze Iranian influence out of Baghdad.


The Businessmen of Baghdad and Washington

Trump made his preference for al-Zaidi clear long before the Iraqi Prime Minister landed in Washington. Following Iraq's parliamentary elections, the dominant pro-Iran coalition, the Coordination Framework, initially pushed to reinstate former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

Trump wasn't having it. He publicly threatened to cut off all U.S. aid, declaring that Iraq would have "zero chance of success" if al-Maliki took power.

That threat cleared the runway for al-Zaidi, who emerged as a consensus candidate and took office in May. When al-Zaidi won, Trump took to social media to celebrate, calling it the start of a brand-new chapter of prosperity.

Now, they are looking to cash in on that connection. Al-Zaidi traveled to Washington with a large delegation of Iraqi business leaders. His goal isn't just diplomatic goodwill; he wants real, hard U.S. investment in Iraq's energy, oil, and power sectors.

"We're going to be doing a lot of deals," Trump told reporters. "We're going to create a lot of jobs for both countries, and we're going to be taking out a lot of oil."

Trump even went so far as to suggest that the era of American military intervention in the region is winding down. "We don't think we need the military there anymore," he said, pointing to the influx of American oil companies and a perceived decline in Iranian dominance.


The Elephant in the Oval Office

Despite the friendly talk of oil deals and "chemistry," al-Zaidi is walking a dangerous tightrope back home.

His political rise is filled with contradictions. He is a self-styled outsider running a crusade against corruption, yet he was chosen by the very political establishment he claims to challenge. He is highly dependent on the established political factions in Baghdad to get anything done.

Then there is his financial past. Before becoming prime minister, al-Zaidi chaired Al-Janoob Islamic Bank. In 2024, the Central Bank of Iraq banned that exact bank from conducting U.S. dollar transactions. The ban came under direct pressure from Washington as part of an effort to stop money laundering and the flow of funds to Iran.

When reporters in the Oval Office asked al-Zaidi about Trump’s past actions—specifically the 2020 targeted killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in Baghdad—the Prime Minister quickly dodged.

"At that time, I wasn't involved in politics," al-Zaidi said. "Let's talk about the future."


The September Deadline to Disarm Militias

The real test of this relationship will come down to how al-Zaidi handles Iran-backed militias inside Iraq.

Following the outbreak of conflict between the U.S., Israel, and Iran earlier this year, these non-state armed groups launched a series of attacks on American bases and diplomatic outposts. Baghdad has officially given these militias until the end of September to disarm.

However, the most powerful armed groups have already stated they have no intention of surrendering their weapons.

Iraq's Security Dilemma:
1. U.S. Demands: Disarm Iran-backed militias to maintain aid and investment.
2. Militia Stance: Flat out refuse to disarm, threatening internal conflict.
3. Al-Zaidi's Position: Stuck in the middle, needing U.S. tech and intelligence to survive.

If al-Zaidi tries to use force to dismantle these groups, they could turn their weapons on his own government. If he does nothing, the Trump administration could quickly pull the plug on the economic partnerships and investments al-Zaidi desperately needs to rebuild Iraq's economy.


What Happens Next

The flashy headlines focus on the personal chemistry between Trump and al-Zaidi, but the clock is ticking. To see if this relationship actually delivers on its promises, watch for these specific developments over the coming weeks:

  • Monitor the September Disarmament Deadline: Keep a close eye on whether al-Zaidi's government actually enforces the order for militias to disarm, or if they quietly extend the deadline to avoid a domestic civil war.
  • Watch the U.S. Dollar Restrictions: Look for whether the U.S. Treasury eases up on Iraqi banks—including al-Zaidi's former bank—as a reward for cooperation, or keeps the financial screws tight.
  • Track Energy Contracts: Watch for formal joint ventures announced between the Iraqi Ministry of Oil and major U.S. energy firms. Real deals, not handshakes, will prove if the business relationship is genuine.
AB

Akira Bennett

A former academic turned journalist, Akira Bennett brings rigorous analytical thinking to every piece, ensuring depth and accuracy in every word.